BTMK Todmans (Rayleigh)
01268 774073

BTMK Solicitors (Southend)
01702 339222

BTMK Marcus Baum
01702 346677

BTMK Goodson (Leigh-on-Sea)
01702 474149

Local rate (All offices 24/7)
03300 585 222

Email (All offices)
info@btmk.co.uk

Contact us

BTMK Todmans (Rayleigh)
01268 774073

BTMK Solicitors (Southend)
01702 339222

BTMK Marcus Baum
01702 346677

BTMK Goodson (Leigh-on-Sea)
01702 474149

BTMK Local rate (All offices 24/7)
03300 585 222

Email (All offices)
info@btmk.co.uk

No fault divorce – who’s to blame? 

The case of Owens v Owens has been of great public interest recently, with lots of media coverage. 

It is, in many ways, a very ordinary case with relatively ordinary facts.  The couple were married in 1978, set up home, had children and then separated in 2015. 

What is exceptional however, is the fact that the divorce has been contested by Mr Owens. Whilst it is common for matters relating to the children or the finances to be contested,  and end up in lengthy Court proceedings, only  1% of divorces themselves are ever contested. 

The only ground for divorce in this country is that the marriage has ‘irretrievably broken down,’ and this in turn is proved by one of the following five facts:- 

  • Adultery. 
  • Unreasonable behaviour. 
  • Desertion. 
  • 2 years separation and both parties consent. 
  • 5 years separation with no consent. 

Most importantly, the behaviour alleged has to be that of your partner and not your own. This obviously leads to one party feeling blamed, which can, although rarely does, lead to contested proceedings, as in this case.  

Mr Owens has contested the divorce disputing the allegations of his unreasonable behaviour. This has led to the case being heard in the High Court and the Court of Appeal, where Mrs Owens has been told her husband’s behaviour was not unreasonable and was “to be expected in a marriage”. 

She has also been told that finding herself in a ‘wretchedly unhappy marriage’ is not grounds for divorce. 

Her only option in these circumstances would be to wait until five years have passed from the initial date of separation, which would mean she remains in a “wretchedly unhappy marriage” until 2020. 

As such this case is now being heard by the Supreme Court and their findings may lead to a fundamental change in divorce law, paving the way for ‘no fault’ divorces in the future. 

This would offer an alternative way to divorce, meaning no one suffers any blame. 

In turn it’s hoped this would allow the more difficult discussions that follow, relating to the children and finances, to start without one party feeling blamed.  Going into such discussions is always difficult enough, but with the parties already laying blame, they are often even more difficult. 

Resolution, the national organisation of family lawyers surveyed its members and 90% felt the current law made it harder to reduce conflict and confrontation. 

No fault divorce would go some way to helping limit the conflict and confrontation that occurs in divorces. These difficult situations are always emotional, painful and upsetting enough for the parties involved and removing some of the blame and hence conflict can only be a positive step towards a simpler, less confrontational divorce process.

What did the Supreme Court decide?

The Supreme Court ruled against Mrs. Owens which means that she must now remain married to her husband until 2020.  There were some clarifications provided in the Judgment which suggests that the term “unreasonable behaviour” which is widely cited in divorce cases but which the Court has clarified is incorrect to do so.  The Judgment provides that it isn’t someone’s behaviour which must be unreasonable but the belief that the other party can continue to live with them.

The Court further ruled that it is not for the Supreme Court to shape the law (changes in the law itself must provide for this through Parliament) but to interpret the law in line with statute.

The case revolved around the correct interpretation of section 1 (2) (b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, which states that a marriage can be dissolved on the basis of one spouse’s behaviour.

Until the law may be reformed, family lawyers face the increasingly complex balancing act of keeping the details of “unreasonable behaviour” as non-confrontational as possible whilst ensuring sufficient gravity to the allegations as to satisfy the requirements under s 1(2)(b), which could be a particular concern in domestic abuse type cases.

We at BTMK will always attempt to help you resolve your marriage issues in a non-confrontational way, with the wellbeing of any children being of paramount importance. We will always attempt to prioritise an amicable solution to the financial issues in order to limit the painful experiences caused by divorce and separation. 

For a free initial consultation call Lee Wilcockson on 01702 238552.

About the Author

With almost 20 years’ experience as a qualified solicitor, Lee specialises in family law, children matters and matrimonial finance and is based in our Southend office. Lee worked previously at the Company up until 2010 and in between, he worked at another large provincial firm and for Essex Legal Services. Lee has a wealth of experience which helps give a unique perspective on your case and leads to well-rounded and thorough advice.

Call for a FREE chat

Give us a call today for a FREE initial chat with one of our legal experts.

Font Resize